Blipping through the many blogs I read daily, I came across an interesting announcement from Astaro in which they advertise the "...world's first UTM virtual appliance." Intrigued, I clicked over here for a peek.
Before you read forward, you should know that I really like Astaro's products. I think that for SMB markets, their appliances and solutions are fantastic. That being said, the word "virtualization" means a lot of things to a lot of people -- there are some liberties taken by Astaro that we're going to need to analyze before this sort of thing can really be taken seriously. More on that later.
I'm nominating this announcement for an Emmy because it's the best use of humor in a commercial that I have seen in a LONG time. I mean really...blade server solutions with full-on clustering and virtualized/grid computing management layers complete with virtualized storage have a hard time providing this sort of service level reliably. You mean to tell me that MSSP's who have SLA's and make their lunch money providing security as a service are going to build a business on this malarkey?
Somebody call Crossbeam's global MSSP/ISP/MO customers who provide services in the cloud to hundreds of thousands/millions of their customers and tell them they can ask for a refund because all they need is a couple of DL380's, VMware, ASG and a set of really big huevos and you've got all the performance, scalability, reliability, high-availability and resiliency you need.
Ah, crap. I'm just such a cynical bastard.
Here's the distillation:
- Take Astaro's Security Gateway product (a very nicely-done hardened linux-based offering with re-packaged and optimized open source and OEM'd components)
- Create a VM (virtual machine) image that can be run under the VMWare VM Player, VM Workstation, VM Server or VM ESX
- Run it on a sufficiently-powered hardware platform
- Presto-change-o! You've got a virtualized security appliance!
It's a nice concept, but again it further magnifies the narrowly focused scope of how UTM is perceived today -- a mid-market, perimeter solution where "good enough" is good enough. It's going to marginalize the value of what true enterprise and provider class UTM brings to the table by suggesting that you can just cobble together a bunch of VM's, some extra hardware and whammo! You've got mail! This is the very definition of scrapture!
However, it seems as though the logic at Astaro goes something like this:
"If one Astaro gateway is "good enough," then running LOTS of virtual Astaro gateways is "even gooder!" AND you can run hundreds of 'em on the same machine (see rediculous quote section below.)
The marketing folks over at Astaro are off to a wonderful June as they really put in the OT to milk this one for all it's worth. Let's get one thing straight, there's a real big difference between innovation and improvisation. I'll let you figure out what my opinion of this is.
Firstly, this concept in the security space is hardly new. Sure, it may be the first "UTM" product to be offered in a VM, but StillSecure has been providing free downloads of its Strata Guard IPS product this way for months -- you download the VMWare image and poof! Instant IPS.
Secondly, I'm really interested in what controls one would have to put in place to secure the host operating system that is running all of these VM's. I mean, when you run Astaro's hardened appliance, that's all taken care of for you. What happens when Johnny SysAdmin boots up VMWare Server on Windows 2K3 and loads 40 instances of his "secure" firewall? Okay, maybe he uses linux. Same question. What happens when you need to patch said OS and it blows VMware sky-high?
Thirdly, how exactly do you provide for CPU/Memory/IO arbitration when running all these VMWare instances and how would an Enterprise leverage this virtual mass of UTM "appliances" without load balancing capabilities? What about high-availability?
Fourthly, what happens to all of these VM UTM instances when the host OS takes a giant crap?
Fifthly, the sheer number of scrapturelicious quotes in this press release is flan-friggin-tastic.:
Astaro Security Gateway for VMware allows customers to flexibly run Astaro Security Gateway software on a VMware infrastructure. Many hundreds or thousands of Astaro Security Gateways can be virtualized in this way, each delivering the network protection and cleaning for which Astaro is famous.
...ummmm...I can only assume you meant on a hundred or a thousand boxes?
Major benefits for users include simpler deployment in large and complex environments, better hardware allocation and reduced hardware expenditures because physical computers can run multiple virtual appliances. And because Astaro’s unified threat management is ASIC-free, performance when running in a virtual machine is maximized.
How do you actually plumb one of these things into a network? How do you configure multi-link trunking utilizing VLANs across the host OS up to the VM instances? This is simpler, how? Oh, that's right...it's PERIMETER UTM...
And then there's the fact that because it runs on generic PC's under a VM, you can ignore the potentially crappy performance and we don't need no stinkin' ASICs -- they only get in the way. That's right, ASIC's make security applications run SLOWER!
“The ability to virtualize gateway security services opens up major new capabilities for managed service providers (MSPs) to deliver air-tight security services to small- and medium-size business customers,” said Richard Stiennon, founder, IT-Harvest Group. “MSPs can leverage their hardware investment while providing dedicated security services to end-user customers, resulting in superior security and manageability.”
Rich, I gotta ask...did you actually say this in regards to Astaro's VM announcement or security virtualization in general? Since there's ZERO reference to Astaro in this quote, I can only assume the latter. If so, your honor is restored. If not, you're buyin' the beer at Gartner buddy because just in case you haven't heard, IDS is dead ;)
Look, I like the fact that you can take their product, try it out under a low-cost controlled test and see if you want to buy it. Great idea. Suggesting that the MSSP's of the world and going to run out in droves, buy a DL380 and solve the North American continent's security woes is, much like my analogy, rediculous.
Folks like Fortinet, Juniper and Cisco are gunning for the low-end market and you can bet your bottom scrapture that they have the will, money and at-bat's to recognize that there is a lot of money to be made by providing virtualized security services -- either in the cloud via MSSP's or in the Enterprise.
But don't worry because they have those annoying things called ASICs, so I'm sure Astaro will be fine.
Virtually yours,
/Chris
